Minnesota Pork Producers
APRIL 2009 PRESS RELEASES

Back to Home Page

NPPC Insists Obama Administration Study Ethanol Expansion

Food Safety Requires Public-Private Partnership

NPPC Wants Russia’s WTO Accession Delayed Until U.S. Pork Plants ‘Relisted’

Groups Urge Obama Administration To Resolve Trucking Issue With Mexico


Food Safety Requires Public-Private Partnership


Washington, April 23, 2009 - To be effective, the nation’s food-safety system must have adequate funding and personnel, food-safety policies and procedures based on sound science and a partnership between federal food-safety agencies and food producers, the National Pork Producers Council today told a congressional panel.


“Producing safe, wholesome pork products is a continuum that begins on the farm,” NPPC Past President Jill Appell, a pork producer from Altona, Ill., told the House Committee on Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry. “The U.S. pork industry will continue to adopt and adapt practices and programs that improve the safety of our nation’s food supply. But America’s food producers need the federal government to be a partner in this effort.”


She noted that, for the most part, federal food-safety agencies, particularly the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS), which oversees the safety of pork and other meat and poultry products, do a good job. But there is room for improvement.


NPPC urged lawmakers to:

  • Establish food safety objectives linked to public health outcomes rather than arbitrary targets.
  • Improve communication about food safety issues among state and federal public health officials and the food industry. 
  • Encourage FSIS veterinarians and inspectors to apply the guidelines for fatigued pigs consistently across the industry.
  • Fully fund programs that monitor antimicrobial resistance.
  • Require FSIS inspectors to follow current processes and procedures for testing pork for antibiotic residues.
  • Base best handling practices and inspections for processing facilities on science.
  • Establish, with input from all stakeholders, proportional responses to animal welfare issues that might arise at processing facilities.
  • Improve the ability of food-safety agencies to hire and maintain the work force necessary to carry out inspections that ensure the safety of food.

to top


NPPC Wants Russia’s WTO Accession Delayed Until U.S. Pork Plants ‘Relisted’

Washington, Aprril 8, 2009 - In a letter transmitted today to President Obama, the National Pork Producers Council and its state affiliate organizations asked the administration to “slow the WTO accession process” for the Russian Federation until U.S. pork plants are relisted and Russia signs an “equivalence” agreement with the United States.

Over the past year, Russia has “delisted” or failed to relist 34 U.S. pork production, processing and storage facilities, meaning 40 to 50 percent of all U.S. pork production is ineligible for export to the country.

Russia did not identify any health or sanitary reasons for its actions, which are contrary to obligations contained in a 2006 side agreement that is part of World Trade Organization bilateral negotiations between Russia and the United States. The agreement established specific criteria and methods for Russian approval of U.S. pork plants. The actions also are inconsistent with the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement, which requires WTO trading partners to recognize the SPS measures of other countries as equivalent to their own. (Russia does not adhere to the WTO principle of equivalence and approves U.S. meat facilities on a plant-by-plant basis.) The U.S. government and the U.S. pork industry have demonstrated to Russian government officials the effectiveness of the U.S. pork plant inspection system in ensuring a high level of product safety.

“If Russia wants to join the WTO, it needs to play by the rules and stop its blatant actions to restrict U.S. pork,” said NPPC President Don Butler. “U.S. pork plants produce the safest product in the world, and they are inspected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Russia should accept our inspection system as being at least as good as its system.”

In its letter to the president, NPPC and 31 state pork organizations urged the Obama administration to press Russia to relist all U.S. pork facilities as a condition for U.S. approval of its accession to the WTO. The organizations also urged the president to withhold Permanent Normal Trade Relations status from Russia until the country recognizes the U.S. plant inspection system as equivalent to its system.

Russia is a top destination for U.S. pork. Since the United States and Russia signed a 2005 agreement establishing quotas with low tariffs for U.S. pork entering Russia, pork exports to the country have increased by nearly 560 percent to $476 million in 2008. That made Russia the No. 5 market for U.S. pork last year.

to top


 

NPPC Insists Obama Administration Study Ethanol Expansion


Washington, April 8, 2009 - With U.S. pork producers still smarting because of high feed-grain prices, the National Pork Producers Council today insisted that the Obama administration study the economic impact of an expansion of corn-ethanol production and usage.

In a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and Carol Browner, who is assistant to the president for energy and climate change, NPPC asked that the administration lead an effort to examine the effects of such an expansion on corn availability, the price elasticity of corn, the users of corn and rural work forces and industries associated with corn.

Recently, there have been growing calls from lawmakers and ethanol stakeholders for raising the cap on blending ethanol into gasoline to 15 percent from its current 10 percent. There also have been signals that the corn-ethanol industry is seeking to increase production in the face of reports that the cellulosic ethanol production mandate of 100 million gallons by 2010 likely will not be met.

NPPC wants the administration to bring stakeholders together to consider all possible impacts of corn-ethanol expansion, including the extent to which increasing blend limits will further increase market speculation, affect grain and commodity markets and actually help the ethanol industry.

“In this new era of openness and transparency and calls for scientific integrity in Washington, I can’t imagine anyone or any organization being opposed to a study on the effects of producing and using more corn ethanol,” said NPPC President Don Butler. “We hope the Obama administration and Congress provide answers to the questions surrounding ethanol expansion before rushing to change ethanol policy – that’s the America way.”

While the U.S. pork industry has not opposed the use of ethanol and the country’s goal of producing 15 billion gallons of corn ethanol by 2015, it has paid a price, literally, in the form of much higher feed costs. Due mostly to those higher costs, pork producers since October 2007 have lost an average of $20 on each hog marketed; the industry has lost between $3 billion and $3.5 billion in equity over the past 18 months.

to top


Groups Urge Obama Administration To Resolve Trucking Issue With Mexico


Washington, April 7, 2009 - An ad hoc coalition, which includes the National Pork Producers Council and 140 other business, manufacturing, food and agricultural organizations, today sent a letter (below) to President Obama urging him to quickly resolve a dispute with Mexico over allowing its trucks to transport goods into the United States.


Mexican trucks now are prohibited from entering the United States despite a North American Free Trade Agreement provision that called for allowing them starting in December 1995 and a February 2001 NAFTA dispute-settlement panel ruling that excluding Mexican trucks violated U.S. obligations under the trade deal. Mexico recently retaliated against a host of U.S. goods, raising tariffs on a number of products.


“We need to get this trucking issue resolved,” said NPPC President Don Butler, “because, although U.S. pork products were not included on the retaliation list, they could be in the future, and, more importantly, our trading partners need assurance that the United States will live up its trade obligations.”

to top




151 Saint Andrews Court, Suite 810 | Mankato, MN 56001 | 507-345-8814 | Fax: 507-345-8681
Minnesota Pork Producers Association